Final Order1 Final Order2 Complaint Case No. CC/30/2015 1. Mr. Gunasekaran S/o Vekatesan No.69 3rd Cross Street Dr. Puratchi Thalavi Nagar, Dharmapuri Puducherry 605 009. pondicherry Pondicherry ...........Complainant(s) Versus 1. The Branch manager Poorvika Mobile World Poorvika Mobile Private Limited No.181 Anna Salai (near Chetty Street Cutting) Puducherry 605 001 ............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. A.ASOKAN PRESIDENT MR. V.V. STEEPHEN MEMBER D. KAVITHA MEMBER For the Complainant: For the Opp. Party: Dated : 10 Jan 2018 Final Order / Judgement BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PONDICHERRY C.C.No. 30/2015 Dated this the 10th day of January 2018 (Date of Institution: 10.04.2015) Gunasekaran, son of Venkatesan No.69, 3rd Cross Street, Dr. Puratchi Thalavi Nagar, Dharmapuri, Puducherry ? 605 009. ?. Complainant Vs. 1. The Branch Manager Poorvika Mobile World, Show Room-2, Poorvika Mobiles Private Limited No.181, Anna Salai (Near Chetty Street Cutting) Puducherry ? 605 001. 2. The Manager Sony India Pvt Ltd., A-31 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate Mathura Road New Delhi ? 110 044 ? Opposite Parties BEFORE: THIRU.A.ASOKAN, B.A., B.L., PRESIDENT Thiru V.V. STEEPHEN, B.A., LL.B., MEMBER Tmt. D. KAVITHA, B.A., LL.B., MEMBER FOR THE COMPLAINANT : Thiru C. Elangovan, Advocate FOR THE OPPOSITE PARTIES : Thiru R. Rajaprakash, Advocate for OP1 Thiru George K. Rajan, Advocate for OP2 O R D E R (This Consumer Complaint was remanded by the Hon'ble State Commission, Puducherry for disposal on merits as per order passed in F.A. No.20 / 2016 dated 10.11.2016 filed by the OP1/ Appellant against the order of the Consumer Complaint in C.C. No.30/2015 by this Forum by order dated 08.10.2015). This is a complaint filed by the complainant under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 praying to: Direct the opposite parties to pay to the complainant the loss of amount of Rs.30,000/-, the value of the mobile phone with interest; or To cure the repair of the mobile phone free from defect with subsequent period of one year warranty; or To replace the mobile phone with similar description which is free from defect with subsequent period of one year warranty Direct the Opposite Parties to pay the complainant Rs.60,000/- for mental agony Direct the Opposite parties to pay to the complainant Rs.10,000/- for costs of the complaint and other reliefs. 2. Today this complaint was called. Complainant and Opposite Parties and Counsel for Opposite Parties, Counsel for complainant present and filed joint compromise memo stating that the above matter is settled and prays to dismiss the complaint. In view of the memo, this complaint is hereby dismissed as not pressed. The memo shall form part and parcel of this order. Dated this the 10th day of January 2018. ASOKAN) PRESIDENT (V.V. STEEPHEN) MEMBER (D. KAVITHA) MEMBER EXTRACT OF JOINT COMPROMISE MEMO FILED BY THE COMPLAINANTS AND OPS It is humbly submitted that the above matter is settled. The complainants herein conveyed his full satisifaction and hereby this joint compromise memo is filed by us. Hence, we humbly pray before this Hon'ble Forum to dismiss the above complaint as the above matter is settled in the interest of justice. Sd/- Sd/- Counsel for the complainant Complainant Sd/- Sd/- Counsel for OP1 Counsel for OP2 ASOKAN) PRESIDENT (V.V. STEEPHEN) MEMBER (D. KAVITHA) MEMBER [HON'BLE MR. A.ASOKAN] PRESIDENT [ MR. V.V. STEEPHEN] MEMBER [ D. KAVITHA] MEMBER